<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 112 millimeters? Surely You Jest ! Depth-of-Field Question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/06/112-millimeters-surely-you-jest-depth-of-field-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/06/112-millimeters-surely-you-jest-depth-of-field-question/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:38:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/06/112-millimeters-surely-you-jest-depth-of-field-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1825593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=73249#comment-1825593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/06/112-millimeters-surely-you-jest-depth-of-field-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1824961&quot;&gt;Jordan Cait&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Jordan. And fixed. With love, a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/06/112-millimeters-surely-you-jest-depth-of-field-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1824961">Jordan Cait</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Jordan. And fixed. With love, a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren Hatch		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/06/112-millimeters-surely-you-jest-depth-of-field-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1825190</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren Hatch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 23:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=73249#comment-1825190</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you went to f/4.5 (and kept the same ISO), your shutter speed would have been 1/1000 for the equivalent exposure.  You had plenty of depth of field.  No reason so sacrifice the extra sharpness you achieved at 1/2000.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you went to f/4.5 (and kept the same ISO), your shutter speed would have been 1/1000 for the equivalent exposure.  You had plenty of depth of field.  No reason so sacrifice the extra sharpness you achieved at 1/2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
