<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Low Do You Go? A Used Canon 800mm f/5.6L IS Lens!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/27/how-low-do-you-go-a-used-canon-800mm-f-5-6l-is-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/27/how-low-do-you-go-a-used-canon-800mm-f-5-6l-is-lens/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:38:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James Saxon		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/27/how-low-do-you-go-a-used-canon-800mm-f-5-6l-is-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1828423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Saxon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2021 01:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=73632#comment-1828423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Number 2 for me and I don&#039;t know why.  They are so close they could be the same image.  Love the way you blurred the feathers to create something different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 2 for me and I don&#8217;t know why.  They are so close they could be the same image.  Love the way you blurred the feathers to create something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Warren Howe		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2021/04/27/how-low-do-you-go-a-used-canon-800mm-f-5-6l-is-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-1828384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warren Howe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2021 18:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=73632#comment-1828384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I actually prefer #1 better, for almost the exact same/opposite reasons.  I believe #1 has a little less blur, but it still shows the motion.  Also, the wing coverts are easy to see for each wing and separate from the upper back feathers being ruffled.  In # 2, the feather groups blur together.  I like seeing how the feather groups work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually prefer #1 better, for almost the exact same/opposite reasons.  I believe #1 has a little less blur, but it still shows the motion.  Also, the wing coverts are easy to see for each wing and separate from the upper back feathers being ruffled.  In # 2, the feather groups blur together.  I like seeing how the feather groups work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
