<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Two New Canon RF Lenses and Two For the Price of One!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/02/26/two-new-canon-rf-lenses-and-two-for-the-price-of-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/02/26/two-new-canon-rf-lenses-and-two-for-the-price-of-one/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:30:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/02/26/two-new-canon-rf-lenses-and-two-for-the-price-of-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1933324</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 23:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=78877#comment-1933324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/02/26/two-new-canon-rf-lenses-and-two-for-the-price-of-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1927237&quot;&gt;Geoff&lt;/a&gt;.

Good catch -- ISO 500 is correct. Thanks for the info on the Z9. I agree on the a1 ...

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/02/26/two-new-canon-rf-lenses-and-two-for-the-price-of-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1927237">Geoff</a>.</p>
<p>Good catch &#8212; ISO 500 is correct. Thanks for the info on the Z9. I agree on the a1 &#8230;</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/02/26/two-new-canon-rf-lenses-and-two-for-the-price-of-one/comment-page-1/#comment-1927237</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 14:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=78877#comment-1927237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great shot.  One of the reasons I sold my Z9 after just 2 weeks with it was the lack of zebras and an EVF that was very difficult to even tell if I was under or overexposed despite the Live preview of the exposure.  Nothing beats the A1.

Is there a typo for the ISO on that eagle image?  On a sunny day I&#039;d think that ISO 1600 seems like it would be way overexposed for f/4 and 1/4000.  I was shooting white Trumpeter swans the other day and I was getting f/4, ISO 500, 1/8000 to expose the whites correctly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot.  One of the reasons I sold my Z9 after just 2 weeks with it was the lack of zebras and an EVF that was very difficult to even tell if I was under or overexposed despite the Live preview of the exposure.  Nothing beats the A1.</p>
<p>Is there a typo for the ISO on that eagle image?  On a sunny day I&#8217;d think that ISO 1600 seems like it would be way overexposed for f/4 and 1/4000.  I was shooting white Trumpeter swans the other day and I was getting f/4, ISO 500, 1/8000 to expose the whites correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
