<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On Keeping Your Image Optimizations Simple &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:29:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1940513</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 17:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=79730#comment-1940513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1940493&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

Unfortunately, I haven&#039;t had quite the success with the DN RAW version and have encountered weird artifact particularly in areas of water splashes.  Also, the default values frequently cause over sharpening or even halos in some some areas.  It is superior in color noise mitigation to competing products, though I find that On1&#039;s NoNoise doesn&#039;t produce similar artifacting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1940493">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I haven&#8217;t had quite the success with the DN RAW version and have encountered weird artifact particularly in areas of water splashes.  Also, the default values frequently cause over sharpening or even halos in some some areas.  It is superior in color noise mitigation to competing products, though I find that On1&#8217;s NoNoise doesn&#8217;t produce similar artifacting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1940493</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 16:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=79730#comment-1940493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1940484&quot;&gt;Alan Halberstadt&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Alan, Me too :) If it works for you, great. I run DN on every image after it is converted and love the results. 


artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/04/19/on-keeping-your-image-optimizations-simple/comment-page-1/#comment-1940484">Alan Halberstadt</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Alan, Me too 🙂 If it works for you, great. I run DN on every image after it is converted and love the results. </p>
<p>artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
