<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Photoshop Ethics and Morality Discussion &#038; Answers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:22:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1991573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=83684#comment-1991573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1991138&quot;&gt;Jeff Walters&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Jeff,

That leads to an interesting question: if you physically change something by picking up a cigarette butt or removing an offending branch, is that any better, more proper, more ethical than removing it in Photoshop?  The former at risk of scaring off the bird?

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1991138">Jeff Walters</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Jeff,</p>
<p>That leads to an interesting question: if you physically change something by picking up a cigarette butt or removing an offending branch, is that any better, more proper, more ethical than removing it in Photoshop?  The former at risk of scaring off the bird?</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1991571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2022 14:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=83684#comment-1991571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1991094&quot;&gt;Mike Hannisian&lt;/a&gt;.

Machine-gun Mike, 

Thanks for your comment. I said most of the above and agree with everything that you say. 

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/11/27/photoshop-ethics-and-morality-discussion-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-1991094">Mike Hannisian</a>.</p>
<p>Machine-gun Mike, </p>
<p>Thanks for your comment. I said most of the above and agree with everything that you say. </p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
