<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What ISO?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/12/19/what-iso/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/12/19/what-iso/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/12/19/what-iso/comment-page-1/#comment-2001060</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 00:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=84074#comment-2001060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[32000]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>32000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Guido Bee		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2022/12/19/what-iso/comment-page-1/#comment-2001022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guido Bee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2022 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=84074#comment-2001022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am guessing not quite so high as Joel, but maybe 4K to 6.4K iso, though I am always amazed by the sensors today.  I am old enough to remember thinking Tri-X and Diafine gave fantastic results at iso 1,600; that the mid &#039;60&#039;s (and of course it was B&#038;W), and High Speed Ektachrome was iso 160: times have changed a bit.  By today&#039;s standards neither was so hot (might be charitable, here).  That&#039;s why I guess I remain reluctant to go to the iso&#039;s we have today.  Thanks for all your work on the site / blog.  Have a great Holiday Season.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guessing not quite so high as Joel, but maybe 4K to 6.4K iso, though I am always amazed by the sensors today.  I am old enough to remember thinking Tri-X and Diafine gave fantastic results at iso 1,600; that the mid &#8217;60&#8217;s (and of course it was B&amp;W), and High Speed Ektachrome was iso 160: times have changed a bit.  By today&#8217;s standards neither was so hot (might be charitable, here).  That&#8217;s why I guess I remain reluctant to go to the iso&#8217;s we have today.  Thanks for all your work on the site / blog.  Have a great Holiday Season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
