<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Lens I Advised Against for 3 Decades. More on Storage	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/02/14/the-lens-i-advised-against-for-3-decades-more-on-storage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/02/14/the-lens-i-advised-against-for-3-decades-more-on-storage/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:19:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sanjeed Quazi		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/02/14/the-lens-i-advised-against-for-3-decades-more-on-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-2013922</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanjeed Quazi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 04:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=85041#comment-2013922</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good morning Guru. Hope you&#039;re doing fine.

I remember clearly that you were against using 400mm f/2.8 super telephoto lens. However, I was never in agreement with it. Use it with fantastic results often paired with 2x extender. Needless to say; I&#039;m talking about the Canon brand.

However, when portability is an issue; I pick up the other great, EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM, again paring it with 1.4x or 2x version III extenders.

I didn&#039;t go mirrorless, no plans to switch either.

Thank you for the post Guru.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good morning Guru. Hope you&#8217;re doing fine.</p>
<p>I remember clearly that you were against using 400mm f/2.8 super telephoto lens. However, I was never in agreement with it. Use it with fantastic results often paired with 2x extender. Needless to say; I&#8217;m talking about the Canon brand.</p>
<p>However, when portability is an issue; I pick up the other great, EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM, again paring it with 1.4x or 2x version III extenders.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t go mirrorless, no plans to switch either.</p>
<p>Thank you for the post Guru.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/02/14/the-lens-i-advised-against-for-3-decades-more-on-storage/comment-page-1/#comment-2013848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=85041#comment-2013848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anthony, Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am hoping that the Eagles and the Chiefs make it back to the big game next year so that Mahomes can kick their butts again!

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony, Thank you for sharing your thoughts. I am hoping that the Eagles and the Chiefs make it back to the big game next year so that Mahomes can kick their butts again!</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
