<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sony 70-200mm II/a-1 (no teleconverter!) Rocks La Jolla	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:12:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/comment-page-1/#comment-2062973</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=88637#comment-2062973</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/comment-page-1/#comment-2062874&quot;&gt;Guy Bralley&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, GB. See my response to Joel :-)

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/comment-page-1/#comment-2062874">Guy Bralley</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, GB. See my response to Joel 🙂</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/comment-page-1/#comment-2062972</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=88637#comment-2062972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/comment-page-1/#comment-2062957&quot;&gt;Joel Eade&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks and fixed. 

What you say is true -- the closer you are to parallel, the greater the depth of field. Consider, however, the following:

At the focus distance of 81.7mm with the 70mm focus distance and the f/2.8 aperture, the depth filed in front of the point of focus is 47.85 meters, and the depth of field behind reaches to infinity. That is one ton of depth of field. 

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2023/12/20/sony-70-200mm-ii-a-1-no-teleconverter-rocks-la-jolla/comment-page-1/#comment-2062957">Joel Eade</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks and fixed. </p>
<p>What you say is true &#8212; the closer you are to parallel, the greater the depth of field. Consider, however, the following:</p>
<p>At the focus distance of 81.7mm with the 70mm focus distance and the f/2.8 aperture, the depth filed in front of the point of focus is 47.85 meters, and the depth of field behind reaches to infinity. That is one ton of depth of field. </p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
