<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 70-200mm f/2.8 is Too Short For Bird Photography. Or Not?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/01/21/70-200mm-f-2-8-is-too-short-for-bird-photography-or-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/01/21/70-200mm-f-2-8-is-too-short-for-bird-photography-or-not/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 14:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony Z		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/01/21/70-200mm-f-2-8-is-too-short-for-bird-photography-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-2068150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Z]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=89056#comment-2068150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really like image #3!  Great composition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like image #3!  Great composition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sue jarrett		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/01/21/70-200mm-f-2-8-is-too-short-for-bird-photography-or-not/comment-page-1/#comment-2067885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sue jarrett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jan 2024 18:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=89056#comment-2067885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Image #1 and #2 and #3 and #4 are well made and interesting. And the images of 6 or 8 or 10 are also interesting and well made.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Image #1 and #2 and #3 and #4 are well made and interesting. And the images of 6 or 8 or 10 are also interesting and well made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
