<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Do Sony a9 iii Images Look So Good at Only 24.6 MP?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 14:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/comment-page-1/#comment-2085881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=89553#comment-2085881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/comment-page-1/#comment-2085439&quot;&gt;Bob Eastman&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry Doctor Eastman :-)

I worked on your SEO. 

with love, a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/comment-page-1/#comment-2085439">Bob Eastman</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry Doctor Eastman 🙂</p>
<p>I worked on your SEO. </p>
<p>with love, a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/comment-page-1/#comment-2085880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 11:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=89553#comment-2085880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/comment-page-1/#comment-2085577&quot;&gt;Roger Smith&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Roger. No., I was comparing the a9 iii images to a-1 images. Opinions differ as to whether the a-1 has an anti aliasing filter. Some say that it has a weak anti aliasing filter. Others state firmly that it does not. And Sony is not talking, at least officially. 

See the discussion here: https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1687834. One thing becomes quickly obvious -- the folks in this discussion know a lot more about the technical aspects of mirrorless photography. I just know how to make great images. Sometimes I wonder if the internet experts have head into the field to photograph birds. 

The fact is that my a9 iii images, when viewed on my MacBook Pro M2, look sharper and more detailed than comparable a1 images. That said, when you blow the images up to 300% or 400%, or view them on a large, quality monitor, a-1 image quality is clearly superior. 

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/03/16/why-do-sony-a9-iii-images-look-so-good-at-only-24-6-mp/comment-page-1/#comment-2085577">Roger Smith</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Roger. No., I was comparing the a9 iii images to a-1 images. Opinions differ as to whether the a-1 has an anti aliasing filter. Some say that it has a weak anti aliasing filter. Others state firmly that it does not. And Sony is not talking, at least officially. </p>
<p>See the discussion here: <a href="https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1687834" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1687834</a>. One thing becomes quickly obvious &#8212; the folks in this discussion know a lot more about the technical aspects of mirrorless photography. I just know how to make great images. Sometimes I wonder if the internet experts have head into the field to photograph birds. </p>
<p>The fact is that my a9 iii images, when viewed on my MacBook Pro M2, look sharper and more detailed than comparable a1 images. That said, when you blow the images up to 300% or 400%, or view them on a large, quality monitor, a-1 image quality is clearly superior. </p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
