<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Word Press Help Needed. And Sony a9iii 420mm Shorebirds	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 14:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/comment-page-1/#comment-2128251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 23:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/?p=90271#comment-2128251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/comment-page-1/#comment-2128153&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Again Adam, 

While editing almost 7,000 images from the same day, I realized that shooting smaller in the frame with the bird farther from you will yield the whole bird sharp. Every time.

a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/comment-page-1/#comment-2128153">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Again Adam, </p>
<p>While editing almost 7,000 images from the same day, I realized that shooting smaller in the frame with the bird farther from you will yield the whole bird sharp. Every time.</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/comment-page-1/#comment-2128153</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 21:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/?p=90271#comment-2128153</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/comment-page-1/#comment-2128017&quot;&gt;Adam&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for commenting, Adam. Glad that you liked the tips. For whatever reasons, the JPEGs look like crap until you click on them to enlarge. 

As for the d-o-f, would you be willing to got to ISO 800 to get the d-o-f needed (f/11) to cover the far foot?  I would not and as I say here often, my aim is to get the bird&#039;s eye sharp. In most cases including this one, folks suggesting &quot;more d-o-f&quot; are simply not dealing in real world situations. In addition, stopping down to f/11 would sharpen the backgrounds to a distracting level :-)

For me, the head angle in Image #1 is pretty much perfect.

In addition, the strip of green seaweed in Image #1 is a huge plus. I would never even think about removing it. If I were an artist, I would have painted it in in the perfect spot just as it is in the photo :-)

a

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2024/05/11/word-press-help-needed-and-sony-a9iii-420mm-shorebirds/comment-page-1/#comment-2128017">Adam</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for commenting, Adam. Glad that you liked the tips. For whatever reasons, the JPEGs look like crap until you click on them to enlarge. </p>
<p>As for the d-o-f, would you be willing to got to ISO 800 to get the d-o-f needed (f/11) to cover the far foot?  I would not and as I say here often, my aim is to get the bird&#8217;s eye sharp. In most cases including this one, folks suggesting &#8220;more d-o-f&#8221; are simply not dealing in real world situations. In addition, stopping down to f/11 would sharpen the backgrounds to a distracting level 🙂</p>
<p>For me, the head angle in Image #1 is pretty much perfect.</p>
<p>In addition, the strip of green seaweed in Image #1 is a huge plus. I would never even think about removing it. If I were an artist, I would have painted it in in the perfect spot just as it is in the photo 🙂</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
