<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Things You Might Not Realize &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/05/09/things-you-might-not-realize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/05/09/things-you-might-not-realize/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 14:27:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/05/09/things-you-might-not-realize/comment-page-1/#comment-2473130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 14:27:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/?p=94153#comment-2473130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/05/09/things-you-might-not-realize/comment-page-1/#comment-2472246&quot;&gt;Alessio V. Pelella&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Alessio, 

Many thanks for your kind words; they are appreciated. And thanks for correcting me on the power zoom ratio; I made a mistake by trusting info that I found on line :-( If you find using a long lens that changes length as you zoom in and out to be stable and well balanced, I can only attribute that to the fact that you have never used a similar lens with internal focus. I have seen numerous folks struggle in the field with this lens. I will make it a point to get my hands on the next one I see. 

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/05/09/things-you-might-not-realize/comment-page-1/#comment-2472246">Alessio V. Pelella</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Alessio, </p>
<p>Many thanks for your kind words; they are appreciated. And thanks for correcting me on the power zoom ratio; I made a mistake by trusting info that I found on line 🙁 If you find using a long lens that changes length as you zoom in and out to be stable and well balanced, I can only attribute that to the fact that you have never used a similar lens with internal focus. I have seen numerous folks struggle in the field with this lens. I will make it a point to get my hands on the next one I see. </p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alessio V. Pelella		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/05/09/things-you-might-not-realize/comment-page-1/#comment-2472246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alessio V. Pelella]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 06:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/?p=94153#comment-2472246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Artie,

I really appreciate your professionalism and way of transmitting techniques and skills.
Your images are wonderful and I have been improving my skills thanks to you.

As Canon user, I would have to comment about the RF 200-800 mm, which so far I used for around 6 sessions.
It requires only 1/4th of round for zooming-out from 200 to 800 mm (not at all several turns of the ring zoom). On the Internet it is not the first time I found this wrong information.
Regarding the stability and weight balance while hand holding: I find this relatively great so far; however I cannot yet state about using with a tripod and comparing with other telephoto zoom lenses.

Kindest regards,
Alessio]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Artie,</p>
<p>I really appreciate your professionalism and way of transmitting techniques and skills.<br />
Your images are wonderful and I have been improving my skills thanks to you.</p>
<p>As Canon user, I would have to comment about the RF 200-800 mm, which so far I used for around 6 sessions.<br />
It requires only 1/4th of round for zooming-out from 200 to 800 mm (not at all several turns of the ring zoom). On the Internet it is not the first time I found this wrong information.<br />
Regarding the stability and weight balance while hand holding: I find this relatively great so far; however I cannot yet state about using with a tripod and comparing with other telephoto zoom lenses.</p>
<p>Kindest regards,<br />
Alessio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
