<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Quasi-Macro 70-200 Backlit Dewdrops. On Happiness	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/12/30/quasi-macro-70-200-backlit-dewdrops-on-happiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/12/30/quasi-macro-70-200-backlit-dewdrops-on-happiness/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 17:55:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/12/30/quasi-macro-70-200-backlit-dewdrops-on-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-2621008</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/?p=96688#comment-2621008</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/12/30/quasi-macro-70-200-backlit-dewdrops-on-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-2618868&quot;&gt;Cliff Beittel&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Cliff. I could have easily used a lot more d-o-f even hand holding. 

Bummer on the botch job ...  I absolutely love getting up early every day and heading out to photography.

much love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/12/30/quasi-macro-70-200-backlit-dewdrops-on-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-2618868">Cliff Beittel</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Cliff. I could have easily used a lot more d-o-f even hand holding. </p>
<p>Bummer on the botch job &#8230;  I absolutely love getting up early every day and heading out to photography.</p>
<p>much love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cliff Beittel		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2025/12/30/quasi-macro-70-200-backlit-dewdrops-on-happiness/comment-page-1/#comment-2618868</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cliff Beittel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 16:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/?p=96688#comment-2618868</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m with David in preferring the vertical crop.  Not only does it show the detail better, but it features the brighter center of the image, and I love the large drops in the lower left corner that grab my eye and lead me up through the rest if the image. I would almost always shoot something like this at f16 to f22 (assuming no background distraction when stopped down) and more than 100 ISO, but then I&#039;d also usually be using a tripod. But even handheld at 1/2500, ISO 1000 would have done the trick, though I don&#039;t see any problem at f6.3.

On health, seems everyone who&#039;s responded is, like Pat, at least somewhat in the danger zone. I&#039;m &quot;only&quot; 76, but while 75 seemed like never ending middle age, 76 feels distinctly old owing to a botched minor procedure back in March that now requires a different minor procedure every three to four months. Definitely treasuring every outing with the camera as another year comes to an end.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with David in preferring the vertical crop.  Not only does it show the detail better, but it features the brighter center of the image, and I love the large drops in the lower left corner that grab my eye and lead me up through the rest if the image. I would almost always shoot something like this at f16 to f22 (assuming no background distraction when stopped down) and more than 100 ISO, but then I&#8217;d also usually be using a tripod. But even handheld at 1/2500, ISO 1000 would have done the trick, though I don&#8217;t see any problem at f6.3.</p>
<p>On health, seems everyone who&#8217;s responded is, like Pat, at least somewhat in the danger zone. I&#8217;m &#8220;only&#8221; 76, but while 75 seemed like never ending middle age, 76 feels distinctly old owing to a botched minor procedure back in March that now requires a different minor procedure every three to four months. Definitely treasuring every outing with the camera as another year comes to an end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
