Canon 5D Mark IV, EOS-1DX Mark II, and 5DS R: Top Canon Tech Rep Rudy Winston Answers My Questions and Yours « Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

Canon 5D Mark IV, EOS-1DX Mark II, and 5DS R: Top Canon Tech Rep Rudy Winston Answers My Questions and Yours

What’s Up?

On Friday, September 2, I completed about five blog posts, two of them (including today’s) very interesting and different to say the least.

Gear Questions and Advice

Too many folks attending IPTs and dozens of the folks whom I see in the field, and on BPN, are–out of ignorance–using the wrong gear, especially when it comes to tripods and more especially, tripod heads… Please know that I am always glad to answer your gear questions via e-mail.


The Streak

Todayโ€™s blog post marks a totally insane, irrational, illogical, preposterous, absurd, completely ridiculous, unfathomable, silly, incomprehensible, what’s wrong with this guy?, makes-no-sense, 296 days in a row with a new educational blog post. There should be no end in sight until my big South America trip next fall. Or not… As always-โ€“and folks have been doing a really great job recentlyโ€“-please remember to use our B&H links for your major gear purchases. For best results use one of our many product-specific links; after clicking on one of those you can continue shopping with all subsequent purchases invisibly tracked to BAA. Your doing so is always greatly appreciated. Please remember: web orders only. And please remember also that if you are shopping for items that we carry in the new BAA Online Store (as noted in red at the close of this post below) we would appreciate your business.

Canon 5D Mark IV, EOS-1DX Mark II, and 5DS R: Top Canon Tech Rep Rudy Winston Answers My Questions and Yours

Top Canon technical representative Rudy Winston, technically a Technical Advisor in Canon USA’s Customer Experience and Innovation Department (part of the camera division) kindly agreed to an interview in which he would answer a few of my and many of your questions. Enjoy. If you have a follow-up question, please leave a comment and I will do my best to answer it or to get it answered.


5div-pre-order

My 5D IV B&H Pre-order ๐Ÿ™‚

To learn the basics of the new EOS 5D Mark IV and how to pre-order your body, please click here.

The Interview

am: Hi Rudy. We will start you off with a softball toss question: does the Canon EOS 5D Mark IV DSLR have Silent frame advance mode?

RW: Yes; both Silent (single-frame advance) and Silent (continuous) are available. The fastest drive speed with Silent/continuous is about 3.0 fps.

AF Questions

am: Everyone wants to know how the AF systems of these three Canon bodies compare in real life, not just on paper: the 1DX Mark II, the 5D IV, and the 5DS R. Can you shed any light on that? In what ways are they identical and in what ways are they different. And what happens when you add a 1.4X or 2X III TC into the mix?

RW: Internal processing of AF information during AI Servo AF continues to give the EOS-1D X Mark II the advantage, at least theoretically, with challenging moving subjects. The AF sensor on both the 1D X Mark II and new EOS 5D Mark IV are identical so both share the same ability to grab onto subjects at lower light levels, and to offer the real-life benefits of expanded AF points available during f/8 autofocus (at effective apertures down to f/8, when compatible lenses are combined with Canon EF Extenders). Real-world AF performance with moving subjects between 5DS R and EOS 5D Mark IV should be essentially similar. There will be a slight edge to the EOS-1D X when the going gets really challenging.

am: Does any of the above have to do with the 360,000 pixel RGB metering system as compared to the 150,000 pixel RGB metering system on the 5DS R and the 5D IV?

RW: Those factors would only come into play in terms of the Intelligent Tracking and Recognition — EOS iTR, as it’s called in-camera. That’s the ability of the camera to combine color and subject identification info from the metering system with focus information from the AF points to help the camera change AF points to follow an erratically moving subject in AI Servo AF. This applies, however, only if the user has set their AF Area Selection Mode to Automatic AF point selection (all 61 AF points active), Large Zone AF, or Zone AF.

The 150,000 pixel RGB metering system–you’re correct, it’s an even more powerful 360,000 pixel metering sensor in the EOS-1D X Mark II–reads not just brightness, but color information, even including the ability to detect human faces. Normally, its advantages apply to exposure-based matters, which isn’t what your question was about. But the RGB color metering does assist with how AF points change to continue to track a moving subject that moves around the frame when the EOS iTR is active; users can turn it off in the AF menu. Again, this applies only if the user has set Automatic AF point selection (all 61 AF points active), Large Zone AF, or Zone AF.

If you are using one AF point or Expanded AF points the 150,000 pixel RGB metering system (or 360,000 on the 1DX II) has nothing to do with AF performance.

AM: Staying on the AF topic, it has always been obvious to me that the pro bodies, like the current 1DX Mark II, drive AF faster especially when a teleconverter is attached to a big lens than do the 5D or 7D series bodies. I have always assumed that that was because of the more powerful battery in the pro bodies. Several friends who are much more technically minded than I am insist that the battery is not the answer. They state clearly that they believe that the 5D or 7D batteries are fully capable of driving AF with TCs and big lenses just as fast as the pro bodies, but that the AF system in the 5D/7D has been damped somehow. Who is right?

RW: We have not received recent technical information on this, but earlier on in the EOS-1D platform’s development, the engineers made it clear that one of the benefits was that with the larger battery, when specific lenses such as the big white super-teles were attached, that the AF system would pull more initial power from the battery to boost the starting performance of the big ring-type USM (ultra sonic motor). As I recall, this was not tele-converter-dependent. Other factors that may add to this impression are the added sensitivity of certain AF points on the EOS-1D X Mark II’s AF sensor, as well as its gains in data processing during AI Servo AF; this would likely be more of a factor during an AI Servo AF sequence rather than at the initial start where the lens is first driven to focus on the subject. That’s the best I can say on it based on the information our engineers are making available to us at the present time.

am: Again, same question here: does anything in the preceding paragraph have anything to do with the 150,000 pixel RGB metering system (or 360,000 pixel RGB metering system of the 1DX II)?

RW: No, again, assuming the use of a single AF point or AF Point Expansion — both of which don’t use color information to change AF point location upon a subject.

5D IV Battery Info

am: Speaking of batteries, is the battery for the 5D Mark IV the same as for the 5D Mark III and the 5DS R? Does the battery grip from the 5D III fit the 5D IV as it does the 5DS R?

RW: The batteries are the same–the 5D Mark IV ships with the Canon LP-E6N Lithium-Ion Battery Pack (7.2V, 1865mAh); the older LP-E6 batteries will also work, albeit at a modestly reduced number of images per charge–no figures are available to quantify that. The battery grip for the 5D IV is different; the new grip is the Canon BG-E20 Battery Grip for EOS 5D Mark IV. The 5D IV body is slightly different in shape and size from the 5D III; this was surely the primary factor influencing development of the new battery grip.

The 5D IV Body Itself…

am: Is this correct, but but for the new AF Area Selection Mode Button, are all the rest of the controls pretty much identical to those on the 5D III?

RW: Essentially, yes. The new 5D Mark IV does add the ability to apply deliberate exposure compensation if Auto ISO is combined with Manual exposure mode via the SET or AF Area Select button. Either of those buttons would need to be re-configured to +/- exposure compensation in the Custom Controls area of the C.Fn menu and then combined with turning the Main Dial on top of the camera.

(artie note: I firmly believe that–for many reasons–folks should stay as far away as possible from using EC when they are working in Manual mode.)

5D IV Dual Pixel RAW Possibilities

am: On the subject of dual pixel RAWs, the Canon video that I saw by our mutual friend Drew MacCallum was pretty impressive. The example on the video was with an image made at a relatively short focal length. My question is, will correcting focus with on images created with long focal lengths be either similar or possible?

RW: For most Dual Pixel RAW applications, the engineers are saying that lenses from normal focal length (roughly 50mm) upward will tend to produce the most noticeable results, although they do go on to say that the Bokeh Shift can be effective with wide-angle lenses as well. One of the key factors is that there is a visible out-of-focus areas in the frame, other than the primary subject. Telephoto lenses will work with this; we’ve received no information about any limit to a telephoto lens’s focal length for using the Dual Pixel RAW process options. Basically, this new feature is most noticeable in shots taken at wide apertures (low f-numbers)and at relatively close distances. Do not, therefore, expect huge results in landscape shots where the plane of sharpest focus is on mountains that are miles away.

am: Wow, that sounds promising; I canโ€™t wait to get mine and try it.

am: On the same subject, how is the buffer of the 5D Mark IV affected when you are creating dual pixel RAW files?

RW: Significantly. We don’t have official numbers, but on an ordinary CF card, my burst rate on a pre-production sample dropped to about 7 consecutive shots before the system had to slow down drastically. The 7 fps is available, but for fewer shots in a row. Normally, with a fast CF card, the EOS 5D Mark IV can shoot up to about 21 full-res RAW images in a continuous burst.

5D IV vs 7D II

am: How would a sharp 5D IV image cropped to comparable 7D II image size stack up as far as image quality is concerned?

RW: Though I haven’t done this comparison, I’d expect some 5D Mark IV advantage stemming from its larger pixel size as well as slightly less noise at the higher ISOs, etc.

The Question Nobody Can Answer Yet…

am: On the 5D IV, can you delay the start time when working with the built-in intervalometer?

RW: I haven’t tried it, and I had to leave my sample with a production company, so I don’t have it at the moment. I Will try this when I get the body back and let you know. I can’t recall, off the top of my head, if there’s a built-in “self-timer” setting within the intervalometer menu.

am: On the 5DS R, I could not find a way to delay the start using the built-in intervalometer.

Anti-aliasing Filter Issues

am: On the topic of the anti-aliasing filters, is it true that they only benefit video? In the same vein many folks are wondering why Canon continues to introduce new bodies with anti-aliasing filters while other major manufacturers have pretty much abandoned them with their latest releases. Please comment on the benefits of the AA filters for still photographers.

RW: Canon’s engineers have long maintained that in terms of total image quality that the presence of a low-pass (Anti-Aliasing) filter represents a benefit, more often than not. While moire patterns in images are rare, there is an increased risk of them with many real-life subjects that have repeating horizontal or vertical detail, and this is the primary problem that the low-pass filters counter. False colors are less prevalent, at least in some instances, when a low-pass filter is in place. The feeling in general is that the reduction in sharpness that they deliver can relatively easily be countered, at least to some degree, with appropriate sharpening/unsharp masking during RAW processing or certainly with image-editing programs. These corrections are much easier to apply than those needed to remove unexpected moire patterns from parts of an image file or stray false colors. And yes, the engineers are certainly aware of the initial sharpness increase that occurs if and when the low-pass filter is either removed completely or cancelled (as in the EOS 5DS R).

High ISO Considerations

am: Assuming that the 1DX II is the high ISO leader in the clubhouse, what can we expect from 5D Mark IV images in comparison.

RW: I don’t have any official numbers to give you. Considering the increase in pixel count and the corresponding reduction in the size of each pixel on the EOS 5D Mark IV image sensor, the fact that there is only a slight decrease in the control of high-ISO noise at normal settings is commendable. Simply comparing files from an EOS 5D Mark III (previous model) to the new 5D Mark IV, it’s not a night-and-day difference at the higher ISOs, at least on the pre-production cameras I’ve sampled. There will be a slight edge going to the to the Mark IV at ISOs of 3200 and above. The EOS-1D X Mark II remains the leader for those for whom low noise levels at high ISOs are their number one priority.

5D IV Digital Media Info

am: Can you confirm that the 5D Mark IV supports only the UHS-I standard secure digital card, but not the more recent, faster, UHS II version?

RW: This is absolutely true, and EOS 5D Mark IV users will need to be careful, moving forward, not to pay for the theoretical performance benefits of UHS-II type SD cards if they intend to use they exclusively in the 5D IV. While the faster UHS-II cards will fit, there’s a possibility that their write speeds may drop to levels slower than those of a typical UHS-I complaint card, for technical reasons. To be clear, the EOS 5D Mark IV’s SD card slot supports SD-type cards up to and including UHS-I compliant cards, but does not have the extra pin connections and circuitry to take advantage of the benefits of UHS-II cards.

Maximum card writing speed is absolutely required for anyone intending to work with the 4K video feature on this camera. According to our engineers, the recommended card performance for 4K video recording is:

CF cards: UDMA-7 compliant; write speeds 100MB/sec. or faster

SD cards: UHS-I compliant; Speed class 3 or higher.

Please note that some cards with the specs above on the package may still not meet the performance requirements for 4K video recording. Still-image shooters who regularly create long continuous bursts of RAW images will likewise benefit from the highest-performance compatible memory cards. The older, slower cards can still be used for less-aggressive applications by folks shooting short RAW image bursts, creating original JPEGs in-camera, or video users working with Full HD (1080p) in the IPB or IPB Light settings, etc.

Thanks Rudy!

am: Rudy, thanks a stack for your time, your help, and for sharing your expertise with us here.

Please Remember to use my Affiliate Links and to Visit the New BAA Online Store ๐Ÿ™‚

To show your appreciation for my continuing efforts here, we ask, as always, that you get in the habit of using my B&H affiliate links on the right side of the blog for all of your photo and electronics purchases. Please check the availability of all photographic accessories in the New BIRDS AS ART Online Store, especially the Mongoose M3.6 tripod head, Wimberley lens plates, Delkin flash cards and accessories, and LensCoat stuff.

As always, we sell only what I have used, have tested, and can depend on. We will not sell you junk. We know what you need to make creating great images easy and fun. And we are always glad to answer your gear questions via e-mail.

I would of course appreciate your using our B&H affiliate links for all of your major gear, video, and electronic purchases. For the photographic stuff mentioned in the paragraph above we, and for everything else in the new store, we, meaning BAA, would of course greatly appreciate your business. Here is a huge thank you to the many who have been using our links on a regular basis and those who will be visiting the New BIRDS AS ART Online Store as well.

Facebook

Be sure to like and follow BAA on Facebook by clicking on the logo link upper right. Tanks a stack!

Typos

In all blog posts and Bulletins, feel free to e-mail or to leave a comment regarding any typos or errors. Just be right ๐Ÿ™‚

33 comments to Canon 5D Mark IV, EOS-1DX Mark II, and 5DS R: Top Canon Tech Rep Rudy Winston Answers My Questions and Yours

  • avatar Bill Fraser

    Artie: will you be publishing a guide to recommended settings for the new 5D IV? Bill Fraser

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      I need to see how different it is from the 5D III…

      Mine comes on Monday ๐Ÿ™‚

      later and love, artie

  • avatar Ry Tipton

    I continue to miss shots when shooting in manual with my 7D Mark II due to the almost invisible vertical exposure scale.
    Does the new 5D Mark IV use this same terrible scale? Thanks so very much.

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      I doubt it as the 5D IV is based on the 5D III not the 7D II. I will know for sure tomorrow when I get my 5D IV.

      a

  • avatar David Burren

    I got a surprise with the 5D Mark IV. In my testing so far I have not been able to achieve faster than 6 fps with AI Servo selected! At least the buffer is huge as a result.

    Experimentation is ongoing of course…

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      That should not be a shock to anyone as I am pretty sure that that has been the case when working in AI Servo AF for all Canon digital camera bodies since the dawn of time. Advertised frames are for One-Shot and Manual Focus only ๐Ÿ™‚

      a

      • Really? The only slow-down from the advertised rate that I’ve found in my earlier cameras was the 5D III which dropped to 4 fps if AI Servo 2nd-image priority was set all the way to “focus” (even if AF wasn’t actually engaged), but kept up at 6 fps otherwise. The 5Ds R stays at 5 fps, and I didn’t detect slow-downs in the 7D II or 1Dx either. I don’t remember slow-downs on earlier bodies (although I didn’t check as thoroughly).
        I always put it down to an example of the 5D III being underpowered compared to the 1Dx, and hadn’t seen it since.

        Of course things will sometimes slow down in unpredictable ways during shooting if you have you have the release priority pushed to “focus” (or Anti-Flicker engaged, etc). But this is even when AF isn’t engaged (AF-ON not pressed).

        So I was surprised and disappointed (although the larger buffer is a silver lining which might make it acceptable) and I’m still hoping that we can identify a particular culprit setting other than simply having AI Servo selected.

        Test results are on my blog.

    • It turns out that keeping an eye on the battery level is the key. As soon as it drops below 50% the 5D Mark IV drops the max frame rate to 6 fps.

  • avatar Sudhir

    Hello Arthur, Is it possible to focus stack two images from the dual RAW capture each edited to focus at a different plane in the Canon software and then recombined in PS / LR. Would this result in a better image with more details? Also how would the details on the images captured with the 5DIV compare to that of the IDX MKII? Thx in advance.

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      Hi Sudhir,

      I do not know but I will ask Rudy this week. I highly doubt it. If you are looking to focus stack then you should focus stack ๐Ÿ™‚

      5D IV images will have higher image quality and better fine feather detail than 1DX II images except at the higher ISOs.

      artie

      • I see a couple of distinct advantages in FS from one frame as you are now less bothered by having to align the image due to the subject moving or the frame moving while hand holding. Just a thought ๐Ÿ™‚

  • In the interview, you refer to a vidรฉo by Drew MacCallum. Can we have thรฉ link to it?

  • avatar Frank Sheets

    Hi Artie,

    Thanks for the post. I have been looking forward to hearing Rudy’s response on the AA Filter question.

    Rudy’s acknowledgment on the sharpness difference when the filter is “removed” is interesting. I am wondering: assuming its possible, lets say a 5DIV owner wants to have the filter removed to determine whether he/she can see any benefit in their images, and they have it done by Canon, would Canon do that for you and if so, would the warranty on the body be honored?

    I guess I’m just curious. Maybe Rudy’s comment that the correction in sharpness can easily taken care of in a simple sharpening step may suffice. But, in that step, in most cases a little noise will be added to the image that otherwise might not be there.

    Again, thanks,

    Frank

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      Hey Frank, Let’s not forget that over the past 15 years probably 95-99% or more of the winning and honored images in the major contests were made with digital camera bodies that had AA filters in place…

      a

  • Thanks, Artie. It was like eavesdropping on a conversation between two accomplished photographers. You asked my questions and more. Regards.

  • avatar Kerry Morris

    Great info. thanks Artie and thanks Rudy! As always, appreciate all that you do, and the time and effort you put into this. As you know, I have used several of your affiliate links and the BAA store too, and will continue to do so in order to support your amazing work.

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      You are welcome and don’t forget that you attended the Nickerson IPT ๐Ÿ™‚ So thank you!

      a

  • avatar Vicki

    Thanks for sharing this useful info Art! I appreciate how generous you are with your knowledge and experience. It’s because of the blogs of this quality that I continue to be a fan and use your affiliate links.

  • avatar Bill Hill

    As David said above, I was hoping to see more comparisons to the 5Dsr. Things like performance at higher ISO, auto p=focus speed.

    Thanks

  • avatar David Burren

    Art, I haven’t found a specific delayed-start setting in the 5DsR (and I think the 7DII was the same but it’s gone now) for the in-camera intervalometer or bulb timer (or a way of combining them) which is why the TC-80N3 still has a place in my kit.

    However in the field my need for it is rare. I can at least combine the Bulb timer with the self-timer to give me a 2 or 10-second start delay. With the intervalometer and the self-timer that delay gets added to the interval so needs to be subtracted from the interval you were aiming for (thus it’s not quite a separate START delay).
    Surely this meets the most-common application (getting your fingers away from the camera before the exposure starts)? For a separate start delay or for scheduling a series of bulb exposures, the TC-80N3 or similar external timer still seems to be the answer.

    I’m expecting the 5DIV to behave in the same way. Certainly the manual indicates that the intervalometer/bulb-timer menus are the same.

    The numbers Rudy mentions re buffer sizes (including in dual-pixel RAW) are straight from the Canon manual. In the past using the right cards has usually allowed us to exceed these numbers a bit, so I’m keen to see what actual card speeds and buffer size the 5DIV will manage with my cards. But not long to wait now!

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      It would be great to have a built-in start times on the 5D IV for starting star trails after you have gone to sleep. The manual for the TC-80N3 is so poorly written that I cannot understand how anyone could understand it… Bummer if they are the same.

      I never worry about the buffer as I have only gotten there twice in 15 years of doing digital…

      a

  • avatar Harold Klein

    Art,
    Thanks for the effort to put this all together!
    Here is my question…

    Does exposure metering track with the focus point as it is moved around the frame??
    Thanks,
    Harold.

    • avatar Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART

      YAW. I will ask but it does not matter at all to me and should not matter to folks properly working in Manual most most of the time…

      a

  • avatar Wtlloyd

    Wow, what a great blog post! That’s some serious meat and potatoes served up, thanks Artie!

  • avatar David Policansky

    Artie: Thanks for sharing this interesting interview. I have one follow-up question. Rudy said he thought that if you cropped a 5DIV image to the size of a 7D2 image, heโ€™d “expect some 5D Mark IV advantage stemming from its larger pixel size as well as slightly less noise at the higher ISOs.” I would be very grateful if you could ask the same question about the 5DS-R and the 7D2, noting that the 5DS-R has the same size pixels as the 7D2.

    Thanks.